Pages

Friday, November 13, 2009

Tragedy

Tragic, sad...

Liz and Madi lost something more precious than money can buy. It's hard to believe that it's their mother who would cause this. Even if it is her illness speaking, someone has to defend the right of the children to have a real father, ever-present.

She lied about a job that keeps her in South Carolina. She lied about Jon and had him removed from their temporary home after six weeks - the home they were promised for 3-4 months. She brought false charges that cost so much in so many ways. When Jon had to go back to Utah so he would not have to live in a homeless shelter and where he could actually get a job, she claimed abandonment by him and managed to convince a commissioner/judge that he could have stayed in South Carolina - homeless, jobless and penniless because what little money they had was spent to get them there - because she believed it would make her happy. When it turned out the promises were lies and they had to go into further debt to make the move, he still did it for her. He told us "I have to do this for Karla." We all knew it was impossible with red flags popping up all over and it proved to be so. It would be impossible for Karla to stay there if it weren't for the very relatives that promised Jon housing, now providing for her. Now she also gets to collect all of Jon's income so she can live where she wants to live and where she can temporarily run away from her problems - or so she thinks as she projects her childhood abuse onto others. The girls never wanted to leave Utah and she doesn't care about them; only herself, yet she says it's "what's best for the children." How can someone defend their children when they don't have the guts to stand up to the bullying uncle when he abused her husband? In fact, she supported and encouraged him in the abuse by filing for an order of protection, guaranteeing that he could not speak to her or the children until the judge overturned it. And then, she continued to deny him access to his own daughters.

The situation is impossible. She continues to lie, her family supports her because it "makes her happy" regardless of what it does to the girls to be deprived of the access of their loving father. They believe her lies even when they know she is ill. How can anyone sit back and watch such unfairness and claim it is in the best interest of the girls? How can those around her continue to believe or excuse the lies when they cause such damage? How can we put such precious children in the hands of a stranger who takes an hour or so to decide their fate?

Any problems they had in their marriage did not warrant what she has done. You can leave a marriage without leaving a wake of disaster. The lies will catch up with her eventually. And one day the girls will realize what was stolen from them just as we realize what has been stolen from us. Karla feels she has won a battle but the scars will live on long past hers. The damage she has done even by association with the church (claiming her membership has prevented her from leaving the marriage before) will have long-lasting effects.

The only chance for some redemption for this terrible situation would be for her to return to Utah where she could obtain real employment, have real family support and help with the children and where the girls could have both of their parents permanently, even if they were not married to each other. But, that would require sacrifice on her part. It would require putting her children's needs ahead of her own and that has never happened yet. She will continue to pretend to have a job, pretend to be capable of taking full care of her children, continue to deprive them of their father because she knows his limited finances, the cost of travel and lodging in South Carolina, and she can live off the state, the uncle, and child support money - thinking this is responsible parenting. It's ironic that she accuses Jon of not supporting them because he was unemployed (along with the other 10% of the population). His real flaw was believing in her, trying to help her and thinking he could undo the damage of childhood abuse. He stood by her through thick and thin, only to be blamed for her psychological problems as she projected her childhood abuse onto him (and many others) and stepped on him like a doormat.

Any mentally healthy, loving parent would do what was necessary to give their children two loving parents and would not insist on keeping them thousands of miles away from their father and other family members they have known and loved their whole lives for their own gratification. Only someone as ill as Karla would think this was a good thing. When the employment opportunities in South Carolina proved to be nothing more than a ruse, she should allow the children to go where their father could find employment - back home in Utah. She is convincing herself and others around her but she is manipulated by those near her and she is a mere puppet. One day the relatives will have to answer for what they have done to also facilitate this abuse of the children by enabling her to manipulate and get back at Jon for divorcing her when it became clear she would no longer allow him to help her and she did the unthinkable to him. Taking him to court for false charges crossed the line of what he could or should endure at her hands. She got a free lawyer; he had to pay. She had housing in S.C.; he had none. She had food stamps and lied to social services to prevent his access to them (verified), saying he had fled the state when she knew better because he needed to stay for the court appearance two weeks later. (She lied to her father and told him the card was not working; she assumed Jon had stopped it when there is a signed statement that she did it) He looked into housing options there but with no money, there was nothing for him. Where was he to stay? What was he to eat? There was no work there. The family made up a fake job for her to tell the court; he came to Utah where he could get a real job and do as the S.C. judge suggested. She told people and convinced the commissioner that he could have stayed there. I would love to hear how that would have been possible after what her uncle did with her approval and prompting. A healthy parent would want what is best for the children and could recognize truth from lies.

Apparently it's not about who is the most fit parent, but it's still the dark ages with regards to father's rights. It's Friday the 13th.

13 comments:

  1. Hell hath no fury like a mother scorned. Debbie, I can understand your rage. I imagine I would feel just as you do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In her mind, Karla can fully justify whatever she does by invoking one simple thought . . . I don't love him anymore.

    That thought/feeling/choice makes it all OK.

    ReplyDelete
  3. amazing how many hits you said you got for this post....I know that it depends on what your TITLE is.....because I have had some posts have tons of hits just depending on what my posts' title is....because it pops up in searches on Google etc....
    such a sad situation for all involved...total bummer :(

    ReplyDelete
  4. It was actually Monday, November 9 that had the high number of hits but the way I track it I can see if it was coming from search engines or others and these were mostly people I know. That's why it is so ironic:) I do enjoy seeing how the search engines pick up particular subjects too, which are coming from Facebook, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. how do you track it? I would love to know...I can look at my map and see cities..but have no clue if it's from search engines or others? is there a program?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm glad you put some of the real issues on your blog so it's not so nebulous for people who haven't been around for the whole story. Unfortunately, you'd have to type for days on end to document all of the wrongs that have occurred just in the past few months.

    My poor, poor brother Jon. I know of no one that is brought more joy from being with their children than him and, knowing this, she has struck him where it hurts most. It is selfish, unjust and WRONG. And you're right - it is the children who will suffer the most devastating, lasting effects. Does she really think they won't end up hating her for making it impossible to see their father? I expect that if she continues on this path it will only be about 10 more years before Liz realizes what she has done. And ten years goes so quickly. Maybe by the time they can think for themselves they will choose not to be with her anymore, which would break her heart and is, again, not best for the children. But by then it will be too late and she won't be able to undo the things she's done. I hope and pray that she has a change of heart before it's too late.

    ReplyDelete
  7. One more thing...I am still appalled by the fact that she won't tell him the gender of the baby.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You're right, Nat. That is pure and simple game-playing retaliation. She insists it is his baby and will expect child support, but he gets no information, and has no say in naming? Have to wonder why she feels justified in not telling him. Seems suspicious to me.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have to wonder where Karla's family is in all this mess. From reading a few times their family blog, it's clear they are members of your church (I well understand that affiliation with any church does not make one a believer/doer at heart) ... but why are they not counseling and supporting her to do the right thing? This is the most bizarre situation I've ever seen -- on top of the fact that it's just plain evil to the girls (let alone what it does to Jon). How do her parents sleep at night knowing what is happening to their granddaughters. Hmmmm ... I suppose I have no business in the middle of this. But being that the situation has been made public, I suppose it's hard for me not to wonder and to ask. I just love your whole family so much, and have fallen in love with the girls through your pictures and stories. My heart breaks for you all.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks. I appreciate your concern. It really is sad for all concerned (except Karla I guess). We too have been puzzled but we realize her family only hears her version of things and she is out of touch with reality and even admitted to Jon previously that she realizes she is a compulsive liar - doesn't know WHY she does it. No doubt it is due to the illness. But her family seems to prefer the hands off approach - everybody cheers Karla on so she will be "happy" but they don't have to actually deal with it or see the consequences. Jon has appealed to them and they will admit that they know he is a good father and that Karla is incapable of caring for the children alone but their answer to him is just, "she's going to try really hard." You're right that we do expect more from church members and I believe family has the responsibility to help steer even adult (childlike) children. And Karla is showing the world what a "good church member" is like and every "bad Mormon" hurts the church as a whole. Karla's sister who lives in Utah knows better but they "love Karla" and don't want to get involved because it is too upsetting. Personally I think superficial hugging and "I love yous" are meaningless if you don't care enough when it really matters. Again, stand for something!

    We decided we had to go public after the hearing because we realized how many lies Karla is spreading among her family and he has consistently tried to help and protect her. It has backfired. Many of our caring friends and family have only heard bits and pieces so this was my attempt to put a very complex situation into a nutshell.

    What they don't realize is that this will never end. When you have children with someone, you don't just wipe them out of your life. No doubt there are fathers who can walk away and just get on with a new life but those girls ARE Jon's life. He waited for Karla to complete Massage therapy school and supported her dream but has not been able to get his own education due to financial trials and family needs. Now his only reason for living is the girls so he won't just go away.

    Until she and her family come to terms with her childhood abuse and she deals with that, any projection onto others that she blames her problems on will only be distractions from the real issue. But, it seems safe to blame others rather than the dead man who really harmed her. The behavior is not unusual for victims of abuse like this, but it is so sad that she is stuck at age 12 and has not been able to mature past that. She is a hurt, lost little girl who thinks that blaming the one man she really could trust and who did everything he could to care for her will result in healing. She's running away from something that she can't run away from. She must confront it head on. We just pray she will before it is too late for the girls. They are very impressionable and will soon forget the father who cared for them daily, cooked for them, played with them, tickled, hugged, and kissed them every day, read stories to them, and was the best dad any child could wish for.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm glad you went public. I think it was the right thing to do. I'm going to send you a private e-mail.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks for this post, Mom. I think it's time I start to share the ENTIRE story with the world. I won't be able to do much through the Christmas season because they're working me so much right now (apparently my numbers have been really good so they've cut other people's hours and given them to me; mixed blessing for sure), but I will be getting it all out there.

    The most difficult thing for Karla to understand in all of this is the difference between feelings and facts. She FELT hurt, so in her mind that meant that I was abusing her. In reality she was virtually incapable of telling me when she was upset with something important, while constantly berating me for unimportant issues. As a result I apparently did things that hurt her emotionally, and she has perceived that as conscious abuse.

    The biggest trouble here is that when she is asked about it she cannot articulate a single instance, much less explain her claim of years of abuse. It's a general feeling, and as she has insisted hundreds (thousands?) of times throughout our marriage, her perception is her reality.

    Unfortunately that is NOT reality. In the real/sane world emotions are based on facts. If your boss compliments you on a job well done, you feel happy/proud/patronized/whatever. If someone drops the ball on something important, you feel disappointed/angry/whatever.

    In Karla's world she feels hurt, so someone must be abusing her. She feels scared, so she must be in imminent danger. She was abused by many men and as a result she doesn't trust any men, so therefore I will do (have done?) the same things to our children that were done to her.

    It is tragic. I'm not perfect by any means, but I can honestly say that I loved her as completely as I could and always put her comfort and happiness first. Unfortunately she isn't capable of perceiving facts as they really are, and her perpetual sadness tells her that I am the cause of all of her misery.

    What truly scares me is the sheer number of real-world examples of people who have gone through this exact pattern of unhappiness, persuasive blaming, self-destructive behavior, and interpersonal chaos, only to finally realize years later that it was their own behavior that caused their unhappiness, and the guilt was so overwhelming that they took their own lives. With Karla's history of self-inflicted harm and suicide attempts this is a VERY real concern, but so is the safety of my children while in her frequently neglectful care.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Forgot to add one helpful analogy for Karla's irrational concerns and beliefs:

    If a child is afraid of monsters under the bed, that doesn't mean, therefore, that the child will be consumed by the monster. Emotions do not create facts.

    ReplyDelete

This blog does not allow anonymous comments. Please identify yourself. Thanks!